JANET: Sample Ballot
NRO – Clinton email scandal; EDKINS – Final debate.
TRUMP/Clinton: SINGER – Trump chatter breaks records; RUSHBO – No business near power; NATIONAL ENQUIRER – Hillary & women; BOYLE – Trump bounces; McHUGH – 96% Media gives to Hillary; DRUDGE LINKS 10/19/16.
MEDIA: McMILLAN & DeVRIES – Assange isolated; ATTKISSON – Newsgate.
END NOTES: MARK LEVIN – 10/18/16.
Janet: Malvern Office for Trump
Location for the Malvern Office for Trump. Phones should be in and phone banks will begin. Right now you can get signs, handouts, and volunteer for door to door campaigning.
The address is: 270 Lancaster Ave, Suite H, Malvern PA 19355
Janet: Sample Ballot
Here is a list of districts in Chester County to see your sample ballot for Nov. 8. Please note the second page! Vote NO on this item. They are trying to increase the retirement age of judges. (Their next job?)
The Pa. Constitution already has a mandatory retirement age of 70!
On the Montgomery ballot it’s the question on the right side.
NRO: “The Clinton-Obama E-mail Scandal
“John Podesta’s e-mails, which we now have courtesy of WikiLeaks, confirm what we already knew: The Justice Department’s decision not to indict Hillary Clinton was a politicized travesty.
“Podesta, a longtime Clinton hand and Democratic party operative, was President Obama’s top political adviser before becoming chairman of Clinton’s presidential campaign in February 2015. As he was transitioning, it was revealed that, as secretary of state, Clinton had regularly transacted government business over a private e-mail account and, in a major national-security breach, had used a non-secure server to send and store highly classified information. Moreover, to (further) evade transparency requirements, Clinton destroyed 33,000 e-mails, falsely representing them as “personal,” having to do with her daughter’s wedding and “yoga.” Nonetheless, the Justice Department declined to bring a case.
“FBI director James Comey’s she-did-but-she-didn’t press conference had already made it clear that Clinton was given special treatment, as had investigative reports and interview summaries pried from the bureau by congressional Republicans. Podesta’s e-mails illuminate the improper coordination between the campaign, the White House, and the State and Justice Departments that led to Clinton’s getting a complete pass. . .”
Brett Edkins, Forbes: “Chris Wallace Moderates Final Presidential Debate Tonight”
“. . . here are details on tonight’s debate:
When: Tonight, 9 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. EST.
Where: University of Nevada-Las Vegas in Las Vegas, NV.
How to watch on TV: Turn to any major network (NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox), any cable news channel, Univision or C-SPAN.
How to watch online: Check out Youtube’s Live channel (streaming coverage from Washington Post, Fox News, C-SPAN and others), Twitter (streaming Bloomberg), Facebook (streaming ABC coverage) or the main networks’ streaming services (with a cable subscription).
Chris Wallace is the first Fox News journalist to moderate a presidential debate. As such, he will ask conservative-leaning questions, while striving for balance to prove Fox News’—and his own—journalistic bona fides. Wallace understands the seriousness of the task ahead of him. As he said Sunday, “This is not a TV show. This is part of civics, the constitution, if you will, in action, because this is helping millions of people decide who we’re going to elect as the next president.”
“While Wallace is one of the more moderate members of the Fox News team, he still prioritizes conservative issues. In deciding which topics to cover in tonight’s debate, Wallace chose issues conservative voters care about: debt and entitlements, immigration, the economy, the Supreme Court, foreign “hot spots,” and “fitness to be president.” Despite the conservative bent, however, these are smart choices because prior debates almost entirely ignored some of these issues. This oversight is particularly galling when it comes to immigration. Trump’s support for a wall and a “deportation force” was central to his success in the Republican primary, yet the issue has been surprisingly absent from the presidential debates. . .”
Erratum: I referred yesterday to “Dennis O’Keefe” Sorry!
Rushbo: “O’Keefe Gets the Goods: Democrat Rent-A-Mobs Incite Violence at Trump Rallies”
“We’ll show up wearing a Planned Parenthood T-shirt. We’ll show up wearing a T-shirt that says ‘Trump is a Nazi,’ and we know that some of these psychotics in the Trump crowd are gonna respond. And once they respond, then we’ll throw the first punch and we’ll hit ’em and the media will cover it to look like the Trump people go nuts.”
“. . . So let’s go now to the Project Veritas tape. This is the founder, James O’Keefe. He’s released a new video entitled, “Rigging the Election,” which investigates demographic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign, Democrat National Committee, inciting violence at Trump campaign rallies. In the video there’s an activist named Zulema Rodriguez. Zulema Rodriguez talks about her efforts and says this.
“RODRIGUEZ: (hidden camera audio/background noise) So B and I did the Chicago Trump event where we shut down, like, all the — yeah. I just had a call with the campaign…
“UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: And the DNC.
“RODRIGUEZ: …every day at one o’clock. And then we also did the Arizona one where we shut the highway down.
“RUSH: By the way, she’s pictured, she’s proud, she’s happy, she’s not hiding. She’s very, very honored to have done what she’s done and she’s happily photographed. And what she said here, I don’t know how well you can hear this — (interruption) You couldn’t, okay. I only could ’cause I have a transcript. Here’s what she said. “So B and I did the Chicago Trump event where we shut it down like all the, yeah, I just had a call with the campaign and the DNC. Every day at one o’clock I talk to the campaign and the DNC. And we also did the Arizona one where we shut the highway down.”
“Remember that? I remember that. They shut down the highway so that people getting to a Trump event were stranded and couldn’t get there and they were out there for over an hour, hour and a half. Some of those people were families. Some of them had babies in the car on the way to a Trump event, and it was shut down. They shut down a highway, and there was there wasn’t no way, there were no access roads or alternate routes. And here she’s claiming credit for it after having talked to the campaign and the DNC every take at one o’clock.
“Now, the next sound bite, Americans United for Change national field director Scott Foval. Now, this guy has just been fired, by the way, which doesn’t mean diddly-squat. They always fire the people once they’re exposed. Like ACORN got rid of people after O’Keefe exposed them. So they fired this guy, who you’re going to hear, “Democratic Operator Fired After O’Keefe Video Expose.” But he’s gonna be taken care of financially. He’ll be given another job undercover down the road. He’ll be doing the same stuff for a different Democrat crowd, different group. And they fire him after he’s done his dirty work, so it’s mission accomplished. So actually he gets severance and who knows what other goodies. This guy’s name is Scott Foval, Americans United for Change. And, again, the theme of this whole video is rigging the election. . .”
Paul Joseph Watson, InfoWars: “O’KEEFE: TV NETWORKS SPIKED STORY OVER FEAR OF “RETRIBUTION” FROM HILLARY CLINTON”
“Mainstream media frightened of giving bombshell undercover videos any attention
“Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe says that television stations across America canceled appearances he was set to make on their networks over fears of “retribution from a future Hillary Clinton administration.”
O’Keefe released his second bombshell video in the space of two days, shocking footage that shows Democratic party operatives scheming on how to “successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale.”
Yesterday’s video, which proves that the violence at Donald Trump rallies – blamed on Trump’s “rhetoric” by the media – was in fact planned in advance by individuals connected to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, went viral online but received little mainstream coverage.
Now we know why.
“Project Veritas Action had television exclusives lined up around the country, those television stations spiked the story at the last minute,” said O’Keefe.
“Our sources tell us the reason they did so was fear of retaliation and retribution from a future Hillary Clinton administration,” he added, concluding, “Truth is dangerous, especially when it challenges those in power.”
O’Keefe’s revelation that TV networks spiked his story over fears that a future Clinton administration would punish them is absolutely chilling, although not surprising given Wikileaks revelations which show how deeply embedded and subservient to the Clinton campaign the mainstream media really is.”
“Well, I mean, folks, right there is corruption admitted to. Here you had an all-agency meeting to discuss the declassification of an email in order to protect Hillary’s claim that she had not trafficked in them. And everybody at the meeting admits to and knows what’s going on. And the FBI says, “Don’t worry, we’re not gonna talk about it. Steinbach of the FBI told Kennedy we would not comment publicly on the matter.” Meaning, whatever you do, nobody’s gonna know about it. We’re not gonna blow the whistle on you. Whatever you do, go ahead, we’re not talking. . .”
Paul Singer, USA Today: “Trump chatter breaking all records on Facebook”
“Every week this month, Donald Trump has shattered his previous records for generating Facebook conversation, and last week users generated more than 307 million likes, comments, shares and posts about him. The prior week, Trump had 253 million Facebook interactions, and the week before that, he had 220 million, according to weekly data provided by Facebook.
“By comparison, Hillary Clinton also hit her all-time high last week with 206 million interactions on Facebook. It was the first time she broke 200 million interactions. . .”
Rushbo: “FBI Document Dump Proves This Woman Has No Business Anywhere Near Power”
“…The pages that were released yesterday are explosive, big-time explosive. Folks, it’s serious stuff. And it all — you can’t conclude anything other — this woman ought not be anywhere near the levels of power. This woman is as corrupt as anybody. This makes Watergate, as I say, look like Romper Room. Now, you may have seen headlines that Hillary’s State Department tried to pressure the FBI to say that various documents located on her home server were not classified. That was critical. It is critical, obviously, because one of Hillary’s lines of defense was to claim — falsely, as it turned out — that she never sent or received classified documents on her off-the-books email system.
She said that in her first press conference that she held at the U.N., and she said it subsequent times. (imitating Hillary) “I never dealt with. I I I I I I never sent or received classified documents. It was a mistake, I’ll never do it again, I learned from it, but I never sent classified documents.”
But to get the full impact, you have to see the relevant portions of the FBI investigation, and they’re all here, in all cases. They’ve been published and I’m gonna just read to you a so-called executive summary of them. “In the first page, an unidentified FBI employee says he was ‘pressured’ to change the classification of an email to render it unclassified. This pressure came from someone within the FBI. . .”
Also: John Hinderaker, Powerline: “HILLARY’S HENCHMEN PRESSURED FBI ON CLASSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS”
“Those headlines are correct, but to get the full impact you really have to see the relevant portions of the FBI investigation. Here they are; in all cases, click to enlarge. But first, a description. . .”
National Enquirer: “Hillary Fixer Breaks Ranks: I Arranged Sex Trysts For Her — With Men & WOMEN”
“Stunning revelations of Clinton bag man!
“Hillary Clinton is a secret sex freak who paid fixers to set up illicit romps with both men AND women!
“That’s the blockbuster revelation from a former Clinton family operative who is sensationally breaking ranks with his one-time bosses to speak to The National ENQUIRER in a bombshell 9-page cover story — on newsstands Wednesday.
“I arranged a meeting for Hillary and a woman in an exclusive Beverly Hills hotel,” the man, who was hired by the Clintons, via a Hollywood executive, to cover up their scandals, told The ENQUIRER. . .”
Matthew Boyle, Breitbart: “Donald Trump Bounces Back From the Brink Heading Into Next Debate”
“NEW YORK CITY — Many professional political prognosticators predict Hillary Clinton will win next month’s presidential election over GOP nominee Donald Trump. But they’re wrong.
“Teflon Don,” as Trump has been called many times, is back on track after the roughest patch of his campaign yet heading into the Las Vegas debate on Wednesday night–all while the Institutional Left propping up Hillary Clinton is withering under scrutiny.
“A new round of polls have put a spring in Trump’s step, as he has reaffirmed his lead in Ohio according to the latest CNN/ORC poll from the Buckeye State and remains within he margin of error right behind Clinton in the latest CNN/ORC polls from Nevada and North Carolina.
“Quinnipiac shows Trump just outside the margin of error right behind Clinton in Florida, and a few points outside the margin of error in Pennsylvania while trailing a bit more but within earshot in Colorado.
“He has retaken the lead nationally in the daily Los Angeles Times/USC poll, after falling into a tie with Clinton, and remains close in other battlegrounds like New Hampshire. In fact, the Live Free or Die state’s latest polling show Trump moving up four points in the latest WBUR survey compared to that firm’s previous results—meaning Trump has actually, despite what the media says, trended upwards since the second presidential debate and the release of a video that sent his campaign into disarray right before the battle he won in St. Louis.
“Before bringing two cute children up on stage with him at his Green Bay, Wisconsin, rally on Monday night, Trump reveled in his comeback. . .”
Katie McHugh, Breitbart: “Study: 96 Percent of Media’s Campaign Donations Go to Hillary Clinton”
“A nonpartisan group finds 19 out of every 20 campaign dollars donated by the media industry are being given to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
“The analysis was conducted by the Center for Public Integrity, and it found that 96 percent of campaign donations by roughly 480 media donors went to Clinton. Roughly 430 media people donated $382,000 to Clinton, while roughly 40 media people donated $14,000 to Donald Trump’s campaign.
“The center named many reporters, editors, and anchors who donated to Clinton and Trump, but did not provide a complete list of the 400-some members of the press it investigated. The center’s study is titled “Buying of the President 2016: Journalists shower Hillary Clinton with campaign cash.”
Drudge Links 10/19/16
MYSTERY SWIRLS AROUND ASSANGE’S STATUS AT ECUADOREAN EMBASSY…
Kerry Demanded Internet Cut?
17,150 Podesta emails, and counting!
Zuckerberg Sought to Coordinate on ‘Political Operations’…
WIKILEAKS: Hillary Wants Obamacare to ‘Unravel’…
SHE ‘CANNOT WALK AROUND’…
4 Million Ineligible and Dead on Voting Rolls…
THOUSANDS OF VOTER REGISTRATIONS ALTERED IN INDIANA…
O’KEEFE: Dems Explain How to Commit Fraud…
Rigging Elections for 50 Years…
ROBERT MCMILLAN and JENNIFER VALENTINO-DEVRIES, WSJ: “WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange’s Isolation Deepens”
“Ecuador’s move follows recent releases of emails from Democratic Party leaders and aides to Hillary Clinton
“. . . There is no evidence of collusion between Russia and WikiLeaks, said Nicholas Weaver, a researcher at the International Computer Science Institute at the University of California, Berkeley. “However, Assange has made it very clear that he’s willing to be a useful idiot for any intelligence service, as long as it furthers his own agenda,” he said.
The Ecuadorean government, in a statement late Tuesday explaining its decision, said that the country doesn’t interfere in external electoral processes and so was temporarily restricting “access to some of its private communication network” within the embassy.
“WikiLeaks had earlier accused the Ecuadorean government of severing Mr. Assange’s internet connection at the behest of U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. A State Department spokesman on Tuesday rejected the assertion as false.
“Mr. Assange still exerts vast influence on the global debate. Others conducting their own disruptive document leaks follow a game plan Mr. Assange sketched out a decade ago. . .”
Sharyl Attkisson, Newsgate: “Newsgate 2016”
“. . . It can be argued that some individual accounts can be rationalized and are not serious breaches of ethics. But taken as a whole, it’s easy to see how we as journalists have done a poor job protecting ourselves from being co-opted by organized interests, often ones that are paid and politically-motivated. Whether we realize it or not, they’ve figured out how to exploit the media and use us to publish their propaganda. It implies a broad and growing trend that has seriously undermined the credibility of the news industry.
Opinion reporters and those who work for obviously ideological news groups are entitled to publish party propaganda. It’s one matter to provide viewpoint journalism. But it’s quite another for us to act as a tool of any interest, publishing narratives or talking points upon suggestion or demand, without disclosing we’ve done just that.
“The following accounts come from human sources, Freedom of Information Act documents and Wikileaks emails. Obviously, this is just a small sampling of the behind the scenes dealings going on between reporters and their sources. . .”
Also – Rasmussen, “Most Say Media, Not Russians, Tilting the Election
“Most voters aren’t buying the story that the Russians are trying to manipulate the election for Donald Trump but think the U.S. media is trying to swing things for Hillary Clinton.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 56% of Likely U.S. Voters believe it’s more likely that many in the media are working to get Clinton elected president. Just 26% disagree and say it’s more likely that the Russian government is working to get Trump elected. Eighteen percent (18%) are not sure. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
“Ninety-one percent (91%) of voters supporting Trump think it’s more likely that most in the media are trying to help Clinton. Only 20% of Clinton supporters agree; 56% of her voters believe it’s more likely the Russians are trying to help Trump. But one-in-four Clinton voters (24%) aren’t sure which is more likely. . .”
“We know she’s broke the law before being elected. What a great day for feminism”
Red Eye, 4:17am, WJR, 760AM, Detroit.
Mark Levin 10/18/16
“On Tuesday’s Mark Levin show, Our voting system is a disaster by design of the left. Voter lists are populated with deceased voters. Republican governors and counties have tried to clean up their voter lists but are always opposed by Democrat operatives and the Obama Administration. Voter ID laws have been routinely opposed by liberals and accusations of racism have been thrown at those who seek to safeguard the franchise. The Left believes it’s in its best interests to have as much as possible that cannot be checked, to have as many voter lists as possible that are filled with errors.
So the question is why? Because they cheat! That’s why! Donald Trump is right when claiming the voter system is rigged but he’s a little off target, its actually worse than what he’s saying. After that, it is going to be tough for Trump to pull a win off. He’s going against a mostly united Democrat Party with a divided Republican Party. Depending on how this election goes it could be a blow out where Hillary Clinton wins and takes the Senate and maybe the House.
“Finally, Brian Mast calls in to talk about his run for Congress in Florida’s 18th District.”